Subject	I've seen a 12.5@109 with 1.9 60 time before. So
Posted by	Agner.S on June 05, 2005 at 10:02 AM
	This message has been viewed 38 times.
In Reply To	Uhh.. 109mph traps would indicate more a high-12 ET, not a posted by Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) on June 04, 2005 at 01:53 PM
Message	I would assume a lower 60 time would result in a lower et and anything below 12.5 I would consider low 12's. Wangster: "Show me an idiotproof product and there is sure to be a better idiot on the way."
Follow Ups	GTZ Road & Track article - vorpalZ 00:05:06 06/04/05 460bhp with a 13.5 1/4??? (n/m) - monty31 00:34:43 06/04/05 They most likely could not hook the tires it came with. - Agner.S 01:46:47 06/04/05 Ya, I was wondering about that 2.4 second 0-30 time... (n/m) - monty31 11:45:37 06/04/05 Uhh.. 109mph traps would indicate more a high-12 ET, not a - Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) 13:53:26 06/04/05 I've seen a 12.5@109 with 1.9 60 time before. So - Agner.S 10:02:15 06/05/05 email those to me and ill host im in high rez... - Zluster(Project Platypus) 02:02:00 06/04/05 can you take them out of .pdf format also? (n/m) - Initial Z 04:09:10 06/04/05 I'll get it done tonight (n/m) - vorpalZ 13:18:34 06/04/05 Awsome - Mike@ZSpeed 11:52:45 06/04/05 10.1:1 Compression ratio? (n/m) - BillZ2+2 12:02:46 06/04/05 Must be supercharged... (hah!) - ZFreak (Dallas) 23:14:42 06/04/05 Any one else notice 4.10 gears - SR Productions 23:25:20 06/04/05 My NA tachs roughly 3000 RPM at 70 so it works out right (n/m) - BillZ2+2 10:47:13 06/05/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.